@MetalRebel88 This is a fact. So much BS talked about let REAL MEN work and P**s off. REAL MEN then fall and DIE and somebody ends up paying. Its the same thinking that argues against seatbelts in cars.
@moobys37 you dumb fuck, you wouldn't put your KID up there, but this isn't about kids.
but a grown man is allowed to do whatever he wants.
if that means throwing bricks up to a roof, more power to him.
and throwing the bricks is much cheaper than buying a conveyor.
So many Osha violations no harnesses, no netting protecting the workers below Couldnt make out if their were hardhats. Also they need warning signs so no one walks onto the worksite. but the big thing is you need fallarrest systems for fall risks more than six feet but Osha rarely fines on the first offence. Dont believe me look at Oshas website. I think the fines are around 7 thousand on severe clauses. Glad no one was killed.
i hope all those motherfuckers got fined out the ass or fired because its people like them who get hurt and the turn around and try to sue the construction company or live off workers comp.
Oh I just love You Tube, you post a comment, it doesn't show so you come back later and it's still not showing hours later, so you post it again and then suddenly both comments are showing. Maybe I should just stop making and replying to them who cares what people thing, who cares what I think. Whatever, ha ha ha :D
Sorry I just have to point this out. That's the "difference between common sense and brute stupidity. Unfortunately most people side on stupidity." :D
Yes I would have to agree there is a difference. Common sense should have told you I was refering to the comment and not the video. Brute Stupidity told you I was, ha ha :)
Hello, I was refering to the guys comment about children "I'd never let them be safe". Unless of course you agree with that also. I don't see anywhere in my comment where I was refering to the conscution site in the video. I was replying solely to the remark about children.
You think? "Never let them be safe"? Sure theres a thing about being too overly protective, but I'm sure if you had children you wouldn't let them play in the middle of a freeway also. Or would you?
11 Comments
@MetalRebel88 This is a fact. So much BS talked about let REAL MEN work and P**s off. REAL MEN then fall and DIE and somebody ends up paying. Its the same thinking that argues against seatbelts in cars.
@moobys37 you dumb fuck, you wouldn't put your KID up there, but this isn't about kids.
but a grown man is allowed to do whatever he wants.
if that means throwing bricks up to a roof, more power to him.
and throwing the bricks is much cheaper than buying a conveyor.
@cipguz what does this video have to do with children?
two grown men taking a calculated risk.
piss off.
So many Osha violations no harnesses, no netting protecting the workers below Couldnt make out if their were hardhats. Also they need warning signs so no one walks onto the worksite. but the big thing is you need fallarrest systems for fall risks more than six feet but Osha rarely fines on the first offence. Dont believe me look at Oshas website. I think the fines are around 7 thousand on severe clauses. Glad no one was killed.
i hope all those motherfuckers got fined out the ass or fired because its people like them who get hurt and the turn around and try to sue the construction company or live off workers comp.
i would tend to agree with the vid
no hats no lifeline
i agree a bobcat is conceived to lift way more than a human but still
Oh I just love You Tube, you post a comment, it doesn't show so you come back later and it's still not showing hours later, so you post it again and then suddenly both comments are showing. Maybe I should just stop making and replying to them who cares what people thing, who cares what I think. Whatever, ha ha ha :D
Sorry I just have to point this out. That's the "difference between common sense and brute stupidity. Unfortunately most people side on stupidity." :D
Yes I would have to agree there is a difference. Common sense should have told you I was refering to the comment and not the video. Brute Stupidity told you I was, ha ha :)
Hello, I was refering to the guys comment about children "I'd never let them be safe". Unless of course you agree with that also. I don't see anywhere in my comment where I was refering to the conscution site in the video. I was replying solely to the remark about children.
You think? "Never let them be safe"? Sure theres a thing about being too overly protective, but I'm sure if you had children you wouldn't let them play in the middle of a freeway also. Or would you?